Bills that limit classroom discussion or lessons which include LGBTQ+ literature, history, or culture are sometimes referred to as “Don’t Say Gay/Trans” bills. While not all bills that censor classroom discussion of LGBTQ+ topics are the same, they all have negative effects for LGBTQ+ students.
LGBTQ-inclusive curriculums are important for LGBTQ students’ health, well-being, and academic success. Research by GLSEN indicates that teaching LGBTQ+ inclusive curriculum means that LGBTQ+ students are less likely to hear homophobic remarks, are less likely to hear negative remarks about gender expression, perform better academically in school, and are more likely to plan on pursuing post-secondary education. Furthermore, the majority of LGBTQ+ students who receive an LGBTQ+-inclusive curriculum at school report that their classmates are somewhat or very accepting of LGBTQ+ people, as compared to a minority of LGBTQ+ students who said the same thing when they were not taught an inclusive curriculum.
Curriculum censorship bills can include a wide variety of provisions and differ from state to state in terms of their scope. “Don’t Say Gay/Trans” legislation explicitly censors discussions of LGBTQ people or issues throughout all school curricula. The grade levels to which this censorship applies varies from state to state, but can include all K-12 education. School censorship legislation also tends to include bans on inclusive books from schools and public libraries, or new processes by which parents can challenge books with LGBTQ+ content and remove them from the shelves. These efforts also often include provisions to remove signals of inclusion, like Pride and Black Lives Matter flags, classroom safe space agreements, or even contact information for inclusive resources for support.